|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 16:42:34 GMT -5
There's no need to weed out the "bad" ones unless someone suggests a "bad" one.
My way: we decide who makes which spot one spot at a time.
Gary's way: Make a list of 100, and then order it.
|
|
|
|
Post by musicalmafia on Apr 10, 2011 16:45:16 GMT -5
There's no need to weed out the "bad" ones unless someone suggests a "bad" one. My way: we decide who makes which spot one spot at a time. Gary's way: Make a list of 100, and then order it. I vote Gary's way. As less will be nominated for each position and hence it will be faster I think. |
|
|
|
Post by Yolomeister G-izzle on Apr 10, 2011 16:47:50 GMT -5
Well, most of them aren't really BAD, but this way we get rid of the worst and only the 100 best are nominatable.
That way, even if our order is off a bit, we still have the top artists without accidently leaving a few off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 16:50:00 GMT -5
Our goal is not to finish this fast.
We should take our time and make sure that it's the best list we can make.
|
|
|
|
Post by musicalmafia on Apr 10, 2011 16:50:10 GMT -5
Well, most of them aren't really BAD, but this way we get rid of the worst and only the 100 best are nominatable. That way, even if our order is off a bit, we still have the top artists without accidently leaving a few off. Word. |
|
|
|
Post by musicalmafia on Apr 10, 2011 16:51:06 GMT -5
Our goal is not to finish this fast. We should take our time and make sure that it's the best list we can make. If we do Gary's way we get as he said the 100% 100 best and regardless if they are in the proper order they will still be the 100 best. |
|
|
|
Post by Yolomeister G-izzle on Apr 10, 2011 16:52:38 GMT -5
Both ways work, but I think mine is just a bit more thorough <_>
This way we still pretty much do your thing but narrow it down to 100 artists first so we don't throw away a bunch of artists at the end.
This way the 100 are the 100 we DEFINANTLY want.
Just ordering them doesn't let us discuss the other artists we throw away at all and just instantly throw them away.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 16:55:00 GMT -5
For each spot we fill in, we will put the best artist left on our list.
After doing that for 100 spots we will reach the 100% best as well.
So really we are doing the same thing in the end (kinda).
I'd like to see what everyone else thinks.
|
|
|
|
Post by SMAP on Apr 10, 2011 16:55:12 GMT -5
I agree with Gary's way more.
The other way is too tedious, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by musicalmafia on Apr 10, 2011 16:57:18 GMT -5
For each spot we fill in, we will put the best artist left on our list. After doing that for 100 spots we will reach the 100% best as well. So really we are doing the same thing in the end (kinda). I'd like to see what everyone else thinks. Yeah but still the feeling will be there that were leaving something out and if only say 3 people are nominating then we will definitely be leaving out good artists at the end. |
|
|
|
Post by Yolomeister G-izzle on Apr 10, 2011 16:58:21 GMT -5
So, first we narrow it down to 100 and THEN we order the artists. It'll make ordering faster also.  |
|
|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 16:58:24 GMT -5
Good point Gary. I'm fine with your way, I'm just more fine with my way lol. Although I think by going "_____ artist isn't good enough/sucks" could make a flame war. The Master List
3 Doors Down
ABBA
AC/DC
Aerosmith
Alice cooper
Arctic Monkeys
Aretha Franklin
B-52s
Bad Finger
Bathory
Beastie Boys
Beck
Bee Gees
Beethoven
Big Star
Billie Holiday
Billy Joel
Black Sabbath
Boards of Canada
Bob Dylan
Bob Marley
Bon Jovi
Boston
Buddy Holly
Buffalo Springfield
Cage The Elephant
CAKE
Can
Celine Dion
Chicago
Chuck Berry
Coldplay
Coroner
Cream
Creedence Clearwater Revival
Daft Punk
Wave Matthews Band
David Bowie
Dead Kennedy's
Death
Deep Purple
Def Leppard
Dio
Dire Straits
Dream Theater
ELO
Earth wind and fire
Elton John
Elvis Presley
Eminem
Faith No More
Fleetwood Mac
Foo Figthers
Foreigner
Frank Sinatra
Frank Zappa
Genesis
Gentle Giant
George Harrison
Gorrilaz
Grand Funk Railroad
Graveyard
Green Day
Guns N Roses
Hall & Oates
Iron Maiden
James Brown
Jerry Lee Lewis
Jethro Tull
Jimi Hendrix
John Cage
John Coltrane
John Lennon
Johnny Cash
Journey
Joy Division
Judas Priest
Kansas
King Crimson
Kiss
Lady Gaga
Led Zeppelin
Lucifer's Friend
Lucinda Williams
Madonna
Mariah Carey
Marilyn Manson
Marvin Gaye
Mastodon
Megadeth
Melvins
Merzbow
Metallica
Michael Jackson
Miles Davis
Minor Threat
Morbid Angel
Mother Love Bone
Mozart
Muse
NWA
Neil Young
Nirvana
No Doubt
Onslaught
Operation Ivy
Opeth
Otis Redding
Paul McCartney
Pearl Jam
Pentagram
Phish
Pink Floyd
Pixies
Porcupine Tree
Primus
Prince
Queen
REM
Radiohead
Rage Against The Machine
Rainbow
Ray Charles
Red Hot Chili Peppers
Rise Against
Robert Johnson
Run-DMC
Rush
Santana
Simon & Garfunkel
Sly & The Family Stone
Smashing Pumpkins
Sonic Youth
Soundgarden
Steely Dan
Stevie Wonder
Stone Temple Pilots
Styx
Sublime
Suicide
Sum 41
Sunny Day Real Estate
Supertramp
Talking Heads
Tears for Fears
Tenacious D
The Animals
The Beach Boys
The Beatles
The Black Keys
The Clash
The Cure
The Doors
The Grateful Dead
The Hives
The Jesus Lizard
The Kinks
The Monkees
The Mountain Goats
The Pillows
The Police
The Ramones
The Replacements
The Rolling Stones
The Sex Pistols
The Smiths
The Sonics
The Stooges
The Strokes
The Velvet Underground
The Vines
The White Stripes
The Who
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers
Tom Waits
Tool
U2
Van der Graaf Generator
Weezer
Willie Nelson
Wings
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 17:01:26 GMT -5
Whoever is the first poster no the new page should move the master list into their post and put it in spoiler tags.
|
|
|
|
Post by musicalmafia on Apr 10, 2011 17:02:30 GMT -5
Good point Gary. I'm fine with your way, I'm just more fine with my way lol. Although I think by going "_____ artist isn't good enough/sucks" could make a flame war. I seriously doubt it will make a flame war and anyone that does try to make a flame war or think it's even a flame war is extremely childish as this is supposed to be a debate and there is going to be arguing it's not directly attacking somebody so I don't consider it flaming. |
|
|
|
Post by Wave57 on Apr 10, 2011 17:02:35 GMT -5
Okay, we'll do Gary's way.
|
|
